Notification System 2: The Realerting #151

2025-09-04T19:41:21Z

parabitdev commented

2025-09-04 19:41:21 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Add notification system that has at least nfty as an output (future should include email/text?)
Add block notifications using the new system
Remove block notifications and exposed ntfy channel from stratifier code

- [x] Add notification system that has at least nfty as an output (future should include email/text?) - [x] Add block notifications using the new system - [x] Remove block notifications and exposed ntfy channel from stratifier code

parabitdev (Migrated from github.com) reviewed

2025-09-09 18:30:20 +00:00

ckpool/src/bitcoin.c

Excellent callout, will prune

parabitdev (Migrated from github.com) reviewed

2025-09-15 21:21:37 +00:00

src/subcommand/server/server_config.rs

					
				@ -35,0 +36,4 @@

				        long,

				        help = "The channel at ntfy.sh to use for block found notifications"

				    )]

				    pub(crate) alerts_ntfy_channel: Option<String>,

I plan to add additional alerts services in the future (email/text/carrier pigeon) and the aim was to reduce the potential future confusion. I am open to instead opening an issue against that plan and dropping the ntfy if you feel that is more natural.

I plan to add additional alerts services in the future (email/text/carrier pigeon) and the aim was to reduce the potential future confusion. I am open to instead opening an issue against that plan and dropping the `ntfy` if you feel that is more natural.

parabitdev commented

2025-09-15 21:24:07 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

The second one worked with simulated events, but has not been tested fully end-to-end.

It will actually require one additional para server and that they be linked via sync. I believe this can actually be implemented as a test as we have all the individual parts working now and they have test wrappers.

The second one worked with simulated events, but has not been tested fully end-to-end. It will actually require one additional para server and that they be linked via sync. I believe this can actually be implemented as a test as we have all the individual parts working now and they have test wrappers.

Sign in to join this conversation.

No reviewers